DCAudioDIY.com

You dont understand the concept of transparency here. The ear canal is approximately 1cm in diameter. If we hear only those waves that are smaller than 1cm in wavelength, we should not hear anything less than 30kHz.

Point is, when you place an obstruction in front of a sound source, it reflects the sound back. Amount of reflection depends upon how much of the source is obstructed. If the wavelength of the source is significantly larger than the obstruction, then only that part of the source is reflected back, and most of the wave will go around the obstruction. That is the concept of "transparency". Transparency does not mean 100% of the sound magically navigates around obstructions to reach its destination.



Crossovers DO NOT cut-off frequencies. Frequencies just attenuated on a sliding scale (slope). So, ALL frequences are still fed to the drivers on both sides of the crossover. The amplitude the signal reduces as you go far away from the crossover point.

The definition of "cutoff" depends on the slope of the crossover. At high slopes such as 48 or 96 dB/octave, for all practical purposes the audible effect of the crossover is that the sounds are cut off. Another thing to remember is that if the crossover is less than 2nd order (12 dB/octave), cone excursion will continue to increase on the low side of the crossover point, adding more excursion and probably higher distortion.

I have never met a JBL that I liked, including the Everest

_________________
Walt

I would convert them to an active system with a dspNexus dsp/crossover.

That would be a great choice. I have an article appearing in the November issue of audioXpress with my impressions of the Nexus I have formed over several year use.

I think DSP is perfect for subwoofers only, anywhere else in the system and you get noise and distortion. Nothing beats a well-designed and sorted passive xover.
Why would anyone put all that crap between you and the music is beyond me.
Forget about the bits and bytes and listen to the music. Go to a live musical event and listen to what real music sounds like then go listen to your system and compare.
Numbers mean absolutely nothing, listen with your heart and soul not your brain and get off the equipment go around circus and chaos.

So it is my imperfect ear verses measurements like these -

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/foru ... iew.35661/

If the measurements tell everything about speakers, what is need for auditions?

Can you deny the fact the two speakers might measure the same but sound totally different?

Last year at Capital Audio Fest, I saw Rich demonstrate benefits of digital room/system corrections. The benefits are palpable for sure.

Ok, but what about preserving the purity of the signal? Any corrections in the digital domain will invariably alter the original signals.

Couple of years ago, I was using Linux based HQPlayer for oversampling with a cheap DAC. Was very happy with HQP.

But, since I got the semi-decent Holo Spring 3 DAC, I found myself preferring streaming unaltered signal with Roon directly to the DAC with DAC running in NOS (Non oversampling mode).

I am using 5-way active analog crossover. Wanted to try room correction with HQ Player's convolution engine, so purchased it.

Found myself again preferring non-oversampled signal going directly to the DAC. Gave up on the idea of room correction.

So, I tend to agree with you. Digital crossovers and room corrections are not a good idea, if the goal is purity.