DCAudioDIY.com

DC Area Audio DIYer's Community
It is currently March 29th, 2024, 9:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: October 11th, 2016, 11:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 10th, 2016, 10:23 pm
Posts: 55
Hi,
Has anyone here ever owned an ARC D76-A? I bought one on e-bay as an impulse buy. It arrived and appears to have original ARC-marked 6550's in it of indeterminate age. The seller claimed that it had been recapped in the last few years. Before I installed it, I had been listening to a freshly rebuilt Marantz Model 16 (solid state) for about 4 years which has such strong bass response that I unhooked my subwoofer. Before that, for about 8 years, I listened to Dynaco MkIIIs, which had somewhat tubby bass. By way of comparison, the D76-A drops off below ~50Hz, and what bass it does have is soft, mushy, and lacks any percussive attack.
If there is anyone familiar with the design, I'd be curious to know if this is an ingrained attribute due to circuit design or transformer construction, or would tube age impact bass response? There is very little info on this model on the web. I found one review that complained expressly about the bass response, but that is just one data point.
Over the last 4 years I built a line stage and a headphone amp. I was astonished by the variance in bass response from various small signal tube manufacturers, so I have to assume that power tubes could experience similar variations.
So, thought/first-hand experience on my situation, and perhaps some thoughts on power tubes known for bass response? ARC does not recommend KT88s due to observed cold-arcing.
Respectfully,
James


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 12th, 2016, 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 24th, 2015, 4:17 pm
Posts: 1701
Location: Parkville, Maryland
My first comment is that if your line stage is capacitor-coupled to the outside world and looking into a nominal 80-kOhm D76A input impedance your output coupling cap could be the bass response limiter.

Also, the D76A has a small value coupling cap right after the volume control that can be an issue not to mention the input couplers to the power tubes.

Then there is no rule that says you have to connect 4-ohm speakers to 4-ohm taps. The D76A has 4, 8, and 16-ohm output speaker taps. You might wish to play with those. An audio buddy found that out with his big-ass Magnepan speakers. The 8-ohm tap performed better with the Maggie's 4-ohm nominal load especially in the mid-range that became more "see-though" and defined.

I have no clue why ARC would not recommend KT-88s but it may have been an issue with tube quality when that amp was designed. There are some very fine KT-88s out there now especially the Shuguang tubes that come close to the sound quality of the original Genelex KT-88s.

Here is a link to the ARC owner's manual that includes the circuit description and a schematic.

http://www.audioresearch.com/ContentsFi ... chemPL.pdf

_________________
Walt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 12th, 2016, 10:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 12th, 2013, 1:49 pm
Posts: 214
I've owned a couple of ARC amps, one of them had pretty poor bass compared to my Mac-30s, but then most amps I have had did not do well in the bass department compared to the Macs. I remember when I got my Cary Rocket 88's I was put off by the lack of bass, however Cary noted in their manual that if the amp had not been powered up for a while, the bass would be lacking and that playing/breaking in the amp over a little time, like a couple of weeks, would remedy that, and indeed it did. IIRC that the D-76 is one of ARC's premier tube amps, so I would let it play in your system for a while and see if that improves things, I would hesitate to make any changes until a break-in period had been established. I would also contact ARC, they are pretty good about keeping their name as a gold standard and may be able to help as well. Hope that helps!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 14th, 2016, 9:01 am 
Offline

Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 2:43 pm
Posts: 216
Location: Potomac, MD
It is possible that the output tubes, and other tubes are weak. ARC ran their tubes quite hot and they did not last very long as a result. If the tubes are weak, the negative feedback will be reduced, causing poor speaker damping. The result could be tubby base, or weak base, depending on the characteristics of your speakers.

David


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 14th, 2016, 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 24th, 2015, 4:17 pm
Posts: 1701
Location: Parkville, Maryland
To add to David's comment -- I have found that any number of audiophiles that get into tube equipment do not own a tube tester.

That is an important instrument for not only checking quality but also matching tubes. And trouble-shooting a problem -- that may seem to be a circuit-failure of some sort -- can be easily qualified as nothing more than a bad tube. Tube amplifiers are generally robust and for the most part a tube is the problem culprit.

_________________
Walt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 14th, 2016, 8:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: October 10th, 2016, 10:23 pm
Posts: 55
Thanks for all the input. Considering the age of the amp and tubes, I don't think "burning in" is an issue at this point. I have spent several hours listening to it today, and in passages with a lot going on simultaneously, it seems muddy compared to the Marantz 16. Considering that the amp was designed under the concept of "high definition" (it even says it on the front :lol: ). Any thoughts?

Considering that it has (IIRC) 15 tubes, it is surprisingly quiet, but boy is it hot! I seriously don't feel comfortable storing vinyl anywhere above it!

While I feel comfortable working on tube equipment (why else would I be in this group?) I've heard about issues with traces lifting off the PCBs. I'm also not comfortable choosing coupling cap values, but then again, that hasn't stopped me from designing stuff before :confusion-confused:

BTW, any recommendations on tube testers in the vintage world?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 15th, 2016, 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: March 2nd, 2013, 2:43 pm
Posts: 216
Location: Potomac, MD
Another thing to consider is that in my experience, many of these 6550 amps had quite a bit of glare to their sound. This could easily unbalance the sound to the point where it seems weak in the bass when the bass is not the fundamental problem.

David


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 15th, 2016, 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 24th, 2015, 4:17 pm
Posts: 1701
Location: Parkville, Maryland
David again hit the "nail on the head." An inherently bright sound can make the sound reproduction sound bass weak. You also need to address the rest of your system since a Marantz 16 is an early S.S. product using early I.C. op-amps that can mask other issues that the Audio Research may be revealing.

Tube testers are numerous but you can't go wrong with the Precision tester:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Precisi ... Sw8w1X~8le

And the Hickok 6000A is very good but the prices have jumped since I got mine -- OUCH!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Hickok-6000A-Tu ... 2274783019

Tube choices beyond the output tubes can make dramatic changes. i know this because I am tube-rolling nut job.

_________________
Walt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 15th, 2016, 1:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: March 12th, 2013, 1:49 pm
Posts: 214
OK, talking about tube testers, you should get a mutual conductance tester, an emissions tester is basically a much less useful tube tester. In particular, that Precision is crap! I would never buy a Precision tester and the one shown may very well not test modern tubes you run across, its too old! There are several issues about tube tester to consider, the ability to weed out obviously bad tube that can damage an amp (shorted tubes) as well as gassy tubes that can also damage an amp via grid current runaway. Both type, emissions tester and mutual conductance tester will do those tests, but when it comes to trying to determine if a tube has useful life, then your only choice is a mutual conductance tester, like the Hickok 6000 (not sure what you mean about crazy prices, a 6000 can be had for around $200 if you look around). There are a number of good mutual conductance testers, including the desirable Hickok 539 B & C models, expect to pay close to $1000 for a good working model that has been calibrated. There are also the TV-7s used by many tube sellers, and the solid state B&K 747 that is also good, but has its issues as well. I use a Hickok 539A and a Western Electric 15874-l2 cardmatic that get good use. I am also in the process of restoring a pair 539B and a 539C Hickok. There are so many variables to consider with tube testers, it is most certainly NOT just buy one and away you go! If you like, you can contact me and we can talk more about it, I would also recommend Tone Lizard's website, he has a lot of info on tube testers that will help your decision process. Hope that helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: October 16th, 2016, 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: July 24th, 2015, 4:17 pm
Posts: 1701
Location: Parkville, Maryland
OY VEY!!! :crazy:

_________________
Walt


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group